量子計算技術與金融業

量子計算是一種基於量子力學原理的計算技術，能在同一時間處理多種可能性，極大提升計算速度和效率。傳統電腦需要數百萬年完成的運算，量子計算可能在數分鐘內完成。隨著技術領先國家在量子計算領域的突破，這項技術正逐漸從理論走向實用化，並預計在不久的將來對各行各業產生重大影響，尤其是對依賴計算的金融業。

金融業高度依賴複雜的數學模型進行風險評估、投資組合優化及市場定價，而量子計算能快速解決傳統電腦難以處理的問題。例如，它能高效計算金融衍生品的價格模型、模擬市場波動並優化高維度投資策略。此外，量子計算能對海量市場數據進行即時分析，提取模式並預測市場走勢，為交易提供更精準的數據。同時，它能顯著提升演算法交易的效率，幫助機構在短時間內搶佔市場先機。對資產管理而言，量子計算能快速處理多變量的資產組合，找到收益與風險的最佳平衡點，協助投資者實現資本增值。

然而，科技的風險與機遇並存，量子計算也不例外。最大挑戰是傳統加密技術的脆弱性。目前金融機構廣泛採用的加密技術基於數學計算的複雜性，而量子計算能快速破解這些技術。一旦攻擊者利用量子計算破解加密密鑰，金融交易、用戶隱私與系統安全將面臨重大威脅。此外，金融業處理大量敏感數據，如客戶身份、交易記錄和資金流動，若量子計算被惡意使用，可能導致數據洩露或交易遭操控。

一項模擬測試顯示，擁有足夠強大量子電腦的攻擊者可在數分鐘內破解2048位RSA加密技術，從而竊取交易數據或篡改支付內容。這表明量子計算可能引發高額資金損失、影響客戶信任甚至引發系統性金融危機。因此，金融機構需提前採取措施應對量子計算的潛在威脅。

應對量子計算帶來的風險，金融機構應採取以下措施：首先，逐步替換現有的加密技術，採用抗量子加密演算法，這些技術不依賴傳統數學難題，能有效抵禦量子計算的威脅。其次，實施分層次的安全策略，包括數據分段加密、即時威脅偵測和縱深防禦，即便某一層加密被攻擊，仍能限制損害範圍，確保系統安全。最後，模擬量子攻擊場景並測試新型加密方案的有效性，確保在量子計算普及後能迅速切換到量子安全技術。

總之，量子計算的興起為金融業帶來了巨大的機遇，但也伴隨著資訊安全的挑戰。傳統加密技術失效和數據隱私威脅是金融機構面臨的主要風險。然而，透過部署後量子加密技術和強化多層次防禦機制，金融業可有效降低量子計算的潛在風險。在量子時代真正來臨前，提前佈局是確保金融系統穩定、安全的關鍵。

尹展軒
Senior IT Consultant

More Updates

Leveraging OutSystems' rapid development strengths, our team achieves true Agile development, focusing intensely on user requirements. However, requirements are never fixed; they take time to refine within the project's cycle. If a developer simply builds projects based on the initial requirements, it leads to significant rework when those requirements are inevitably revised. This creates serious technical debt that can derail a project's schedule. To combat this, we strictly follow the OutSystems Canvas Design architecture to define each module's usage and content. We generalize logic into foundational modules, optimizing reusability and providing high adaptability when requirements change. This approach allows us to eliminate complicated dependencies—avoiding the deployment nightmares that plague monolithic systems. The Real-World Challenge: "The Spaghetti Monolith" We’ve all seen it. A project starts fast. The "Idea-to-App" time is record-breaking. But as sprints pass and requirements evolve, the "interest rate" on technical debt spikes. Suddenly, changing a simple UI element breaks a core business process because the logic was trapped inside the screen. Deployment becomes a "big bang" event where everything must go live at once because of circular dependencies. In our team, we don't just "code fast"; we architect for resilience. Our Solution: The 4 Layer Canvas Strategy We treat the 4 Layer Canvas not just as a suggestion, but as our structural imperative. Here is how we use it to handle volatile requirements:  Isolating Volatility (End-User Layer): We keep our User Interfaces (UI) and interaction logic in the End-User Layer. This layer is highly volatile—it changes constantly based on user feedback. By isolating it, we can redesign a "Customer Portal" without risking regressions in our core business rules.Stabilizing Business Logic (Core Layer): We abstract our entities and business rules into the Core Layer. This is the backbone of our factory. Whether the data is accessed by a Mobile App, a Web Portal, or a Timer, the validation rules remain consistent. This promotes the "Don't Repeat Yourself" (DRY) principle.Enabling Independent Deployments: By using Service Actions (Weak Dependencies) in our Core layer, we decouple our modules. This allows different squads to deploy changes independently without forcing a factory-wide refresh—a critical enabler for our CI/CD pipelines.The Governor: AI-Driven Architecture How do we ensure we stick to these rules when moving at Agile speeds? We don't just rely on manual code reviews; we use the AI Mentor System. This tool acts as our automated architect. It scans our entire factory to detect architectural violations that humans might miss, such as: Upward References: Preventing foundational libraries from depending on business logic.Side References: Ensuring our End-User apps don't tightly couple with one another.Circular Dependencies: Identifying the "deadly embrace" between modules that locks deployments.The AI Mentor System quantifies this debt, allowing us to pay it down proactively before it hinders our release velocity. Join a Team That Values Architecture In our Taiwan office, we believe that low-code doesn't mean "low-architecture." We are building resilient, composable enterprise ecosystems that can scale. If you are a developer who cares about structural integrity, clean code, and mastering the art of OutSystems architecture, we want to hear from you. 

𝗣𝗵𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘄

Does the following screenshot look familiar to you? Calendar invites that seem to appear out of nowhere in Microsoft Teams or Outlook, asking you to “review important information” or “resolve an account issue”?A phishing campaign has been found abusing Microsoft Teams calendar invites to deliver malicious links and files directly onto users’ calendars. These events often mimic Microsoft notifications, come from odd or external addresses, and include attachments such as .htm or .js files that, when opened, they can lead to credential theft, malware installation or even full remote access for the attacker.With phishing tactics evolving so quickly, ongoing awareness training remains critical and essential. Effective programs use realistic phishing simulations combined with targeted training to help employees recognize and report suspicious emails quickly, turning them into an active detection layer alongside your technical controls.At Ringus, we offer phishing simulation assessment services, with the following key features:💫Tailor-made realistic phishing templates💫Flexible campaign duration and cadence💫Comprehensive reporting and analytics with insights

𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝘂𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (𝗥𝗔𝗚) 𝗔𝗜 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲

Germany's Data Protection Conference just released comprehensive guidance on AI systems with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) - a game-changer for organizations implementing AI governance under ISO 42001.Key Compliance Requirements:🔎Data Accuracy - Enhanced Large Language Model (LLM) responses but error accountability remains🔎Transparency - Improved document traceability within RAG knowledge bases🔎Purpose Limitation - Technical implementation through client/functional separation🔎Data Minimization - Strategic vector database content management🔎Data Subject Rights - Full rights coverage across prompts, outputs, and databases👉 Why This Matters for ISO 42001:RAG systems are becoming mainstream for internal chatbots and enterprise AI. The Data Protection Conference guidance directly aligns with ISO 42001's requirements for AI risk management, data governance, and algorithmic accountability.Organizations deploying RAG technology must now ensure their AI management systems comply with both German data protection standards and international ISO 42001 frameworks.Our cybersecurity and privacy consultation expertise helps organizations navigate these complex requirements, ensuring your RAG implementations meet regulatory standards while maximizing business value.